Study Alternatives We Considered
The study evaluated how many lanes Kitsap Way would need in the future based on regional growth traffic forecasts for the area. The study determined that Kitsap Way has excess capacity, and changing from four lanes to three lanes would meet future vehicle demand, improve corridor safety, and allow space for non-motorized users (like people walking, biking, or rolling).
Using community input from the first open house, the study team developed three alternative concepts for the Kitsap Way corridor. The study team developed these alternatives as cross-sections to understand the look and feel of the corridor. These preliminary alternatives include vehicle travel lanes, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, landscaped areas, intersection control, and property access treatments.
We used the following design criteria to develop the alternatives for Kitsap Way:
- Safety: address existing and potential deficiencies.
- Pedestrians and bicycles: provide low “level of stress” facilities for all ages and all abilities.
- Traffic operations: support future volumes and operations.
- Transit operations: accommodate corridor bus operations.
- Vehicle access to properties: provide property access and parking.
- Property impacts: minimize the number of property impacts and right of way required.
Preliminary Corridor Alternatives
The study team developed the preliminary alternatives to provide a range of options that best met the design criteria.
- Alternative A included improvements to the corridor at a lower cost.
- Alternative B provided additional features with more cost.
- Alternative C had more improvements but also higher costs.
These alternatives were reviewed and refined by working with City staff, the project’s Steering Committee, and the Complete Streets Committee. The study team presented them to the public for review and comment at the second open house. To learn more about the preliminary design alternatives and the analysis we conducted as part of early study phases, please see the archive of our June 2023 Online Open House here.
Preferred Alternative
The preferred alternative represents this study’s suggested concept for the Kitsap Way corridor. After we incorporate the feedback received from this open house, we will assemble the final preferred alternative along with background information, cost estimates, and an implementation plan into a report. The City Council will consider, with public input, the adoption of the preferred alternative. As the City moves the project forward, additional design efforts will be conducted with future opportunities for public input.
Input gathered from community outreach, the Steering Committee, and the Complete Streets Committee informed the development of the preferred alternative, which is a mix of the three corridor alternatives. The preferred alternative will reduce serious crashes and improve safety and comfort for people driving, walking, and rolling along the corridor. This page illustrates the features of the preferred alternative, divided into three segments for ease of understanding.
The preferred alternative’s level of design is very preliminary (about 10 percent design). This means additional design will be needed in the years ahead.
Segment 1: Kitsap Junction
The northwest portion of the study area between Northlake Way/Chico Way and Harlow Drive is the primary commercial area of the corridor.
Segment 2: Kitsap Way Between Harlow Drive and Austin Drive
In this segment, improvements focus on shared use pathways, redesigning the corridor as a three-lane roadway, and a new roundabout on Kitsap Way at Austin Drive and Lyle Way.
Segment 3: Kitsap Way between Austin Drive and SR 3
In this segment, the shared use path on the west side is divided to create a downhill bike lane, left turn lanes are added at intersections, and changes are made at SR 3 and Auto Center Way intersection.








